this comes down to the idea that there are historically two forms of truth: 2 is perspectivism a subtype of relativism? Ground truth是真实标注框,也就是人工标注,一般被看作“真值” bounding box 一般认为(为什么是一般认为,原因参照下面一段最后括号中的内容) 是网络最终预测的结果,也就是“可能.
But still i'm confused about the exact meaning. 5 whether truth can exist without language and that truth is an objective reality that exists independently of us are not opposed claims, although they don't imply one. It is commonly agreed that there is a clear distinction between fact and opinion.
For instance, for plato truth describes reality, but neither truth nor reality are equated, for him, with the physical/material. But there's a second consideration, which is. There is no absolute truth because we as humans are restrained from ever knowing it is fallacious, what humans can know imposes no restriction on what is. The problem, however, is to determine what is real.
I first read the forum discussion here f. Physical facts can be verified. Well, the truth itself is the way things are, and like you're saying, there isn't so much we can do to further define that. Relativism in its naive form is that truth is merely relative, so perspectivism, which asserts that truth is relative to the perspective.
Opinion varies and may be based on faith. I'm curious about the difference between fact and truth. how can we attain ‘truth’ if all we can do is justification?