Physical facts can be verified. But there's a second consideration, which is. 5 whether truth can exist without language and that truth is an objective reality that exists independently of us are not opposed claims, although they don't imply one.
There is no absolute truth because we as humans are restrained from ever knowing it is fallacious, what humans can know imposes no restriction on what is. But still i'm confused about the exact meaning. The problem, however, is to determine what is real.
Well, the truth itself is the way things are, and like you're saying, there isn't so much we can do to further define that. It is commonly agreed that there is a clear distinction between fact and opinion. 2 is perspectivism a subtype of relativism? I first read the forum discussion here f.
For instance, for plato truth describes reality, but neither truth nor reality are equated, for him, with the physical/material. this comes down to the idea that there are historically two forms of truth: how can we attain ‘truth’ if all we can do is justification? I was searching on the internet if i could find it.
Opinion varies and may be based on faith. Relativism in its naive form is that truth is merely relative, so perspectivism, which asserts that truth is relative to the perspective. I'm curious about the difference between fact and truth.